Skip to main content

How to Get (everyone) to Sesame Street



Sesame Street was created to help prepare young children, especially children from low-income areas, for school. The show would help low SES students catch-up by giving them access to basic literacy and math skills. Or so it was intended. What actually ended up happening was something referred to by Attewell & Battle (1999) as the “Sesame Street Effect.” Low-income students did improve academically as a result of watching the program. Their rate of improvement, however, was significantly less than their higher SES peers. Thus instead of “catching-up,” lower SES students were left further behind. A technology intended to be an equalizer, ended up increasing the achievement gap.

“The Sesame Street Effect” is in on the forefront of my mind when it comes to technological innovation in education. The problem was not the technology. Sesame Street was a brilliant concept that really did help kids learn. The issue was that higher SES and lower SES children engaged with the program differently. Higher SES children would watch the program with an adult who could mediate between the technology and the child. The adult could ask follow-up questions and repeat the learning objectives. Lower SES children would watch the program on their own. The differences in how the children engaged in the technology can perhaps explain the differences in their rates of academic improvement.

I’m one of the believers who thinks that technology will revolutionize education over the next five to ten years. But I don’t think this will happen, or at least it won’t happen for ALL students, unless we really think about the role of the adult (the parent, the teacher) in mediating between these new technologies and the child.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Digital Divide: Not just Access but Usage

When I first learned about the digital divide the focus was on access---ensuring that low-income schools had the same access to computers and the internet as higher income schools. This access gap was real and the focus was justified. In 1998 the ratio of students to instructional computers connected to the internet was 17.2 in schools with greater than 50% minority students enrolled and 10.1 in low minority student schools—a very significant gap. But over the last 12 years, as the price of computing has fallen beyond anyone’s expectations and with federal programs like ERate, the in-school access divide has all but disappeared. A study by Gray and Lewis (2009) showed that high schools with student populations of more than 20 percent at or beneath the poverty level have just below the amount of access to online district resources (90 percent compared to 94 percent) of higher SES schools as well as access to course management and delivery software (58 percent compared to 59 per...
2 comments
Read more

"I think we are in a street fight and most people in this room think we're in a college debate." Howard Fuller, NewSchool Venture Fund 2012 Summit

This discussion between Howard Fuller and Jonathan Schorr is from the opening session of this year's  NewSchool Venture Fund Summit. It's inspiring and funny. If you don't have time to watch the whole video, check-out the below highlights:    6:50: Howard Fuller:  "I think we are in a street fight and I think most people in this room think we're in a college debate. Our opponents are reading  Saul Alinsky and we reading Steven Brill."  12:25: Howard Fuller: "There's a small group of people in the circle who are going to storm the bastille.  There's another group of people around the circle of the people who are stroring the bastille who are going to hold the coats. They not storming the bastille but they are holding the coats.  There's another group around them that are going to cheer for the coat holders; they're not holding the coats, they're not storming the bastille, but they are going to cheer. You feelin me? We got t...
Post a Comment
Read more